OIP — The Opportunity Intelligence PlatformMy OIPOIP / Government Intelligence
Preparing the stored Government Intelligence discovery view.
OIP / Government Intelligence / Opportunity detail
Source: Stored live-derived Government dataStephanie Bogan Grantor
OIP derived this review page from stored live-derived Government Intelligence source records. The official source and issuing agency remain authoritative.
Opportunity Intelligence Platform is an independent service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Government. Official notices, amendments, attachments, eligibility requirements, funding terms, and deadlines remain under source control.
OIP scores and explanations are informational and do not guarantee eligibility, suitability, compliance, contract award, or financial outcome.
Private institutions of higher education; City or township governments; Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments); Special district governments; Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized); Public and State controlled institutions of higher education; State governments; County governments
4 warning(s) require review.
Objective score, derived by OIP · How it works
Publication decision: Publish with warning
Laboratory Flexible Funding Model (LFFM) -- a Cooperative Agreement (Cooperative Agreement) issued by Stephanie Bogan Grantor.
Objective Government score 61 for grants-gov-358411, computed from source evidence and Government scoring configuration.
novelty (insufficient_evidence): novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
11 evidence record(s) support this pipeline result.
Next action: Review the official Grants.gov opportunity and follow the listed application package instructions.
95/100 · Ok
evidence_quality reflects a federal-source baseline plus completeness of deadline, funding value, eligibility, and official-source fields on this specific record.
90/100 · Ok
confidence reflects OIP's confidence in its own interpretation of this record's lifecycle and funding-value status, not confidence that any applicant will qualify.
88/100 · Ok
potential_value reflects the disclosed award ceiling or floor for this specific opportunity.
48/100 · Ok
urgency reflects the number of days remaining until the disclosed application deadline.
70/100 · Ok
difficulty reflects this opportunity's cooperative-agreement funding instrument, which typically involves substantial federal involvement and negotiation.
55/100 · Ok
time_required reflects the coordination and negotiation overhead typical of a cooperative-agreement funding instrument.
55/100 · Ok
capital_required reflects that cooperative agreements often require applicant cost-sharing as a matter of federal funding-mechanism convention; confirm the exact requirement in the official notice.
50/100 · Ok
risk reflects the number of material evidence gaps on this record (undisclosed value, missing deadline, unlisted eligibility, or a stale source date), not ordinary competitive uncertainty.
Laboratory Flexible Funding Model (LFFM)
$.detail.opportunityTitle · Field Mapping · 98/100 confidence
358411 / RFA-FD-25-007
$.detail.id · Field Mapping · 99/100 confidence
Stephanie Bogan Grantor
$.detail.synopsis.agencyName · Field Mapping · 97/100 confidence
Cooperative Agreement
$.detail.synopsis.fundingInstruments · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
This cooperative agreement is intended to enhance the capacity and capabilities of state human and animal food testing laboratories in support of an integrated food safety system (IFSS). This is achieved through prioritized sample testing and food defense preparedness in the areas of microbiology, chemistry, and radiochemistry, as well as method development and capacity/capability development projects that support and expand food safety and food defense testing.
$.detail.synopsis.synopsisDesc · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
2025-02-06T05:00:00.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.postingDate · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
2028-01-11T00:00:00.000Z
$.searchHit.closeDate · Field Mapping · 92/100 confidence
Applicant types: Private institutions of higher education; City or township governments; Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments); Special district governments; Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized); Public and State controlled institutions of higher education; State governments; County governments
$.detail.synopsis.applicantTypes · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
Applicant organizations applying for product testing tracks must be accredited to ISO 17025 in at least one human or animal food testing method applicable to the discipline for which they are applying.Applicant organizations applying for tracks other than product testing must be accredited to ISO 17025 or have a quality system that ensures quality assurance and quality control of laboratory testing including but not limited to: validated methods, document control, training programs, and analyst competency requirements.Applicant organizations applying to any track other than Whole Genome Sequencing must have a valid 20.88 agreement with FDA prior to the time of application.
Official source materials control eligibility, deadlines, amendments, attachments, and funding terms.
Open official sourceNo numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
$.detail.synopsis.applicantEligibilityDesc · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
1500000.00
$.detail.synopsis.awardCeiling · Field Mapping · 92/100 confidence
2025-02-06T20:49:12.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.lastUpdatedDate · Field Mapping · 88/100 confidence