Overview
- Funding agency
- U.S. National Science Foundation
- Source
- Grants.gov
- Opportunity #
- 24-564
- Funding instrument
- Grant
- Notice type
- Grant
- Actionability
- Open for response
- Lifecycle
- Open
OIP / Government Intelligence
Preparing the stored Government Intelligence discovery view.
OIP / Government Intelligence / Opportunity detail
Source: Stored live-derived Government dataU.S. National Science Foundation
OIP derived this review page from stored live-derived Government Intelligence source records. The official source and issuing agency remain authoritative.
Opportunity Intelligence Platform is an independent service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Government. Official notices, amendments, attachments, eligibility requirements, funding terms, and deadlines remain under source control.
OIP scores and explanations are informational and do not guarantee eligibility, suitability, compliance, contract award, or financial outcome.
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
4 warning(s) require review.
Objective score, derived by OIP · How it works
Publication decision: Publish with warning
IUSE / Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED) -- a Grant (Grant) issued by U.S. National Science Foundation.
Objective Government score 74 for grants-gov-353413, computed from source evidence and Government scoring configuration.
difficulty (insufficient_evidence): difficulty could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. time_required (insufficient_evidence): time_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. capital_required (insufficient_evidence): capital_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. novelty (insufficient_evidence): novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
11 evidence record(s) support this pipeline result.
Next action: Review the official Grants.gov opportunity and follow the listed application package instructions.
95/100 · Ok
evidence_quality reflects a federal-source baseline plus completeness of deadline, funding value, eligibility, and official-source fields on this specific record.
90/100 · Ok
confidence reflects OIP's confidence in its own interpretation of this record's lifecycle and funding-value status, not confidence that any applicant will qualify.
88/100 · Ok
potential_value reflects the disclosed award ceiling or floor for this specific opportunity.
48/100 · Ok
urgency reflects the number of days remaining until the disclosed application deadline.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
difficulty could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
time_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
capital_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
IUSE / Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED)
$.detail.opportunityTitle · Field Mapping · 98/100 confidence
353413 / 24-564
$.detail.id · Field Mapping · 99/100 confidence
U.S. National Science Foundation
$.detail.synopsis.agencyName · Field Mapping · 97/100 confidence
Grant
$.detail.synopsis.fundingInstruments · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (hereinafter referred to as RED) is designed to build upon previous efforts in engineering education research. Specifically, previous and ongoing evaluations of the NSF Engineering Education and Centers Division program and its predecessors, as well as those related programs in the Directorate for STEM Education, have shown that prior investments have significantly improved the first year of engineering students’ experiences, incorporating engineering material, active learning approaches, design instruction, and a broad introduction to professional skills and a sense of professional practice – giving students an idea of what it means to become an engineer. Similarly, the senior year has seen notable change through capstone design experiences, which ask students to synthesize the technical knowledge, skills, and abilities they have gained with professional capacities, using reflective judgment to make decisions and communicate these effectively. However, this ideal of the senior year has not yet been fully realized, because many of the competencies required in capstone design, or required of professional engineers, are only partially introduced in the first year and not carried forward with significant emphasis through the sophomore and junior years. The Directorates for Engineering (ENG) and STEM Education (EDU) are funding projects as part of the RED program, in alignment with the Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) framework and Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE) initiative. These projects are designing revolutionary new approaches to engineering education, ranging from changing the canon of engineering to fundamentally altering the way courses are structured to creating new departmental structures and educational collaborations with industry. A common thread across these projects is a focus on organizational and cultural change within the departments, involving students, faculty, staff, and industry in rethinking what it means to provide an engineering program. In order to continue to catalyze revolutionary approaches, while expanding the reach of those that have proved efficacious in particular contexts, the RED program supports four tracks: RED Planning (Track 1), RED Adaptation and Implementation (Track 2), RED Innovation (Track 3), and RED Innovation Partnerships (Track 4). Two- and four-year institutions are encouraged to submit to any track as appropriate for their goals and context. RED Planning (Track 1) projects will support capacity-building activities at institutions of special interest to NSF’s mission, including two-year engineering-centered programs building transfer partnerships, two-year or four-year institutions in EPSCoR jurisdictions, Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs), and Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) in order to create more opportunities in engineering for students in every part of the country. Planning projects should provide the support for such institutions to explore the development of a RED Projects in Tracks 2, 3, & 4. RED Adaptation and Implementation (Track 2) projects will adapt and implement evidence-based organizational change strategies and actions to the local context, which helps propagate this transformation of undergraduate engineering education. RED Innovation (Track 3) projects will develop new, revolutionary approaches and change strategies that enable the transformation of undergraduate engineering education. RED Innovation Partnerships (Track 4) projects will achieve the same goals as Track 3 projects across multiple institutions. Of particular interest to this track are projects partnering two-year institutions with other eligible institutions. Projects in tracks 2, 3, & 4 will include consideration of the cultural, organizational, structural, and pedagogical changes needed to transform one or more departments to ones in which students are engaged, develop their technical and professional skills, and establish identities as professional engineers or technologists. The focus of projects in these tracks should be on the department’s disciplinary courses and program. RED project initiatives are expected to be institutionalized at the end of the funding period. Proposals are especially encouraged that address areas of increased national interest including but not limited to advanced manufacturing, advanced wireless, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, microelectronics and semiconductors, net zero technologies, sustainability, systems engineering, and quantum engineering.
Official source materials control eligibility, deadlines, amendments, attachments, and funding terms.
Open official source50/100 · Ok
risk reflects the number of material evidence gaps on this record (undisclosed value, missing deadline, unlisted eligibility, or a stale source date), not ordinary competitive uncertainty.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
$.detail.synopsis.synopsisDesc · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
2024-04-05T04:00:00.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.postingDate · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
2027-04-13T00:00:00.000Z
$.searchHit.closeDate · Field Mapping · 92/100 confidence
Applicant types: Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
$.detail.synopsis.applicantTypes · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
*Who May Serve as PI: For all tracks, the Principal Investigator (PI) must be a Department Chair/Head (or equivalent) of a department for whom a significant percentage of students will graduate or transfer to a program with a bachelor’s degree in engineering or engineering technology. The PI must be empowered to provide leadership for the proposed change process. In cases where the institutional responsibilities of a Department Chair/Head do not enable them to support the degree of change being sought, a Dean, Provost, or other senior leader may serve as PI, provided they will be responsible for the active leadership of the RED project. The qualifications of the PI can be justified in the required letter from senior institutional leadership. It is recommended that projects consider including individuals with expertise in (a) engineering education research and (b) organizational change on the leadership team.
$.detail.synopsis.applicantEligibilityDesc · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
2000000.00
$.detail.synopsis.awardCeiling · Field Mapping · 92/100 confidence
2026-10-20T17:48:06.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.lastUpdatedDate · Field Mapping · 88/100 confidence