OIP — The Opportunity Intelligence PlatformOIP / Government Intelligence
Preparing the stored Government Intelligence discovery view.
OIP / Government Intelligence / Opportunity detail
Source: Stored live-derived Government dataU.S. National Science Foundation
OIP derived this review page from stored live-derived Government Intelligence source records. The official source and issuing agency remain authoritative.
Opportunity Intelligence Platform is an independent service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Government. Official notices, amendments, attachments, eligibility requirements, funding terms, and deadlines remain under source control.
OIP scores and explanations are informational and do not guarantee eligibility, suitability, compliance, contract award, or financial outcome.
Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility"
5 warning(s) require review.
Objective score, derived by OIP
Publication decision: Publish with warning
Cyberinfrastructure for Public Access and Open Science -- a Grant (Grant) issued by U.S. National Science Foundation.
Objective Government score 76 for grants-gov-353475, computed from source evidence and Government scoring configuration.
difficulty (insufficient_evidence): difficulty could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. time_required (insufficient_evidence): time_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. capital_required (insufficient_evidence): capital_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate. novelty (insufficient_evidence): novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
9 evidence record(s) support this pipeline result.
Next action: Review the official Grants.gov opportunity and follow the listed application package instructions.
86/100 · Ok
evidence_quality reflects a federal-source baseline plus completeness of deadline, funding value, eligibility, and official-source fields on this specific record.
90/100 · Ok
confidence reflects OIP's confidence in its own interpretation of this record's lifecycle and funding-value status, not confidence that any applicant will qualify.
88/100 · Ok
potential_value reflects the disclosed award ceiling or floor for this specific opportunity.
55/100 · Ok
urgency reflects a rolling program with no fixed application deadline.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
difficulty could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
time_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
capital_required could not be scored: no application-complexity, preparation-burden, or applicant-cost evidence is available for this opportunity beyond generic boilerplate.
60/100 · Ok
Cyberinfrastructure for Public Access and Open Science
$.detail.opportunityTitle · Field Mapping · 98/100 confidence
353475 / PD-24-7414
$.detail.id · Field Mapping · 99/100 confidence
U.S. National Science Foundation
$.detail.synopsis.agencyName · Field Mapping · 97/100 confidence
Grant
$.detail.synopsis.fundingInstruments · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
The Cyberinfrastructure for Public Access and Open Science (CI PAOS) program within the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) aims to catalyze new and transformative socio-technical partnerships supporting research data infrastructure ecosystems across d omains through early-stage collaborative activities between cyberinfrastructure researchers, scie ntists , research computing experts, data management experts , research labs , university libraries , and other communities of practice. The CI PAOS program supports the NSF Public Access Initiative by encouraging innovation across the CI ecosystem t o address accessibility, discoverability, reliability, reproducibility, sustainability, and utility of data products in alignment with NSF and national goals for public access and open science [ See: NSF Public Access Initiative , Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum on Ensuring Free, Immediate, and equitable Access to Federally funded Research , and Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories for Federally Funded Research ] . CI PAOS builds on previous investments including those through Dear Colleague Letters NSF 19-069 , NSF 20 -068 , NSF 23-018 , and the FAIROS R esearch C oordination N etworks ( RCN ) p rogram solicitation ( NSF 22-553 ) . NSF accepts proposals pursuant to this Program Description year-round. From time to time , NSF may also issue Dear Colleague Letters to encourage proposals on special thema tic interests and opportunities related to this progra m . GUIDANCE TO POTENTIAL PROPOSERS A primary feature of successful CI PAOS projects is a robust, synergistic collaborative team comprising skills from across communities of science/engineering, research data science, and information science discipline(s) and expertise in leveraging connections between cyberinfrastructure researchers and providers and data specialists . Leveraging international collaboration to build shared norms and address c hallenges related to developing and implementing PAOS policies and practices is encouraged . Research and education in science and engineering benefit immensely from international cooperation. P roposals with an international component are also welcome [See: International Collaborations Opportunities at NSF ] . Proposers must target one or more of th e following themes/pathways: Competency Building, Capability Building, and /or Community Building. Competency Building Open s cience /engineering-driven collaboration . A socio -technical collaborative approach in addressing disciplinary , interdisciplinary , domestic, and international data lifecycle challenges is critical to informing and guiding the development of principles, requirements , and standards of a CI ecosystem that fosters pipelines to good data management and pathways to access. Propos al s should clearly describe the goals, challenges, and rationale for the proposed data science and engineering project and include an explanation of the potential for transformative research and broader impacts on the open science ecosystem [ See: U.S. NSF Broader Impacts ] . Successful proposals will also clearly identify utilization science scenarios and use cases . C apability Building Exploratory and pilot activities. <span class="TextRun SCXW92189242 BCX4" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" d
Official source materials control eligibility, deadlines, amendments, attachments, and funding terms.
Open official sourcerisk reflects the number of material evidence gaps on this record (undisclosed value, missing deadline, unlisted eligibility, or a stale source date), not ordinary competitive uncertainty.
No numeric value · Insufficient Evidence
novelty could not be scored: no current Government source provides a reliable per-record signal for whether an opportunity is genuinely novel versus long-standing.
$.detail.synopsis.synopsisDesc · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
2024-04-10T04:00:00.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.postingDate · Field Mapping · 96/100 confidence
Applicant types: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility"
$.detail.synopsis.applicantTypes · Field Mapping · 94/100 confidence
600000.00
$.detail.synopsis.awardCeiling · Field Mapping · 92/100 confidence
2025-08-02T03:00:09.000Z
$.detail.synopsis.lastUpdatedDate · Field Mapping · 88/100 confidence